Of course we can, but I don't believe we'll achieve unanimous consent, based on my understanding of the room. I was just going to propose a path forward.
First of all, I do think that an amendment to clean up the grammar, so that we're not implying that the minister has a company, is well in order. It could probably be done by unanimous consent, since we want them to have a nice, clear invitation that makes it clear why we want them to appear before the committee.
Secondly, because there are people at the table who would like to take this motion in different directions, one way to wipe the slate clean, potentially, is to vote on the motion, see where it goes, and, if it fails, propose a different motion—or we can vote on the motion, pass the motion and then propose a second motion.