Speaking to the amendment, if I may, it seems unclear, first of all, who is making the decision as to which of the two individuals comes to the committee, whether it's the chair of the committee in the invitation or whether it's the Government of Alberta when they get the invitation and it says either this minister or that minister.
I think “or” just confuses matters, and I would much prefer.... I think the compromise here is to have the word “and”. We invite both of the ministers and then we can pose questions to both of them.