My concern with an amendment like that and the original motion is that this kind of presumes to know why, and we don't know exactly why. We would like to know exactly why. We all would like to see more renewable energy projects, but I don't think that a proper motion should presume that it's due to some factor, any one factor, before we actually investigate.
We can listen to one group or another group, but it shouldn't be in the motion, because the motion should be accepted by all members. We should work on it together, and we should identify the reasons for it.
I want to look into this. I'm eager to know more, but I don't think the preface of a motion should include a conclusion.