Thank you for that question.
We're still considering whether to do a follow-up on it, because of the vast change in numbers from what our audit team was provided and what was publicly released in the summer.
If I can turn your attention to exhibit 1.3, I think this will help to clarify things. As you know, in an audit, the department signs off on the factual accuracy of our materials at the draft stage, before we provide it.
This exhibit showed what they had planted in 2021 and what the estimate was for 2022. They did not say that they had the equivalent of what you would call “trees receivable” or “accounts receivable” from the low-carbon economy fund in the number of 50 million, which would have doubled the numbers in here. They did not say, “Oh, we're just waiting for the numbers. Hold on and we'll have this.” We were told that this is what they were planting, and we were told that the program was about incremental trees, not double counting trees from other programs.
If I could just finish on this, Mr. Chair—