You can ask them whether they have a plan.
I think they have agreements in place—agreements in principle to get them to 300 million or 400 million at this stage of the two billion. There are still plenty of years left, so they could do it.
Is there enough land in Canada to accommodate two billion incremental trees? Yes, there definitely is, but it should not be done in a way that replaces natural grasslands, fills in wetlands or things like that. Obviously, it should be in areas that have already been degraded and that could benefit from not only tree-planting but also, as we emphasized in our report, ecological restoration. Planting a forest is much more important than planting a tree farm. There have been recent scientific studies about the adverse impacts of tree-plantation approaches that, sure, can maximize carbon sequestration in some cases but might also have a net detriment for local biodiversity and human well-being.
If they could dovetail the two billion trees program with the new global commitment to the restoration goal that arose from the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity conference in Montreal in December, we could have reforestation and habitat restoration, as opposed to just counting trees and carbon.