There are a lot of “doubles” in there. I'll try not to engage in any doublespeak in responding to that.
I don't know what the motivation was, other than good news is better than bad news. We unfortunately are sometimes the bearer of bad news, but not always. Some of our reports indicate that things are going smoothly.
Whatever their motivation was, it sounds today as though these other two programs, the LCEF and the disaster program, aren't intended to contribute a large portion of the two billion trees. It's still open to them to say that they'll revert back to planting two billion incremental trees and keep it simple. That's something that's open to them to do.