Thank you for very much for the question.
I agree. With pesticides, water quality monitoring and, more generally, research and science more broadly, citizen science can be an important and powerful tool to generate data that government departments as well as academics and other partners can use.
It's an important piece of a broader complementary approach to investments in science, meaning that citizen science would not be the exclusive mechanism by which we would generate science. We would certainly invest internally with our research and monitoring capacities, as well as with academics and other partners, thereby insuring a comprehensive review from all science. We would not be relying on one specific source uniquely.