It is a concern. That's why recommendation 84 is there, about making substantive information publicly available, not just to our office but to the public. There was a question earlier from Mr. Bachrach, I believe, about sectors accounting for the most increases in emissions since 1990, and oil and gas is one of those. This plan says that oil and gas emissions are going to go down by 31%, even though they've been rising from 1990 until now, by 80% to 90%. That's a critical piece of information in the plan, that they're expecting a significant drop and that the trend line is going to reverse course.
We would like to know exactly how they got there, and I'm sure members of the committee would like to know how they got to that 31%. If they don't address the biggest sector in terms of emissions in a way in which they can show their work in terms of getting there, then Canadians will not have confidence in the plan. That's why I think an increase in transparency will not only help to bring more rigour to the process; it will also help the department in convincing Canadians that it is adding value and that they're getting value for money. These measures do cost people money; they cost industry money, and they cost government money. Let's see. Show your work in terms of the—