There's a risk regarding the sustainability of the management. We had hoped to look at both the quality of the information base—that is, the monitoring data—and how it's used to good effect to sustain fisheries, but because we encountered so many of the same problems that we had seen seven years ago, the report focuses mainly on trying to tidy up the information base so that they have the information available that is dependable and timely and will help ensure the sustainability of the stock. It's going to take that step of filling in these gaps in the information bases before we can confidently assess one way or another whether the stocks are being sustainably managed or not.
We didn't see any problems with the use of the information they had. Regardless of its limitations, they weren't looking at information and then deciding to set quotas that were too high regardless of whether they were using the information they had properly. The problem that we identified in the report is the quality of that information, not the use of it.