Evidence of meeting #88 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was management.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Bloc
Monique Pauzé Bloc Repentigny, QC
I don't want to prolong all this, but if I contest your decision to rule this motion in order...
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
Excuse me for a moment.
I just want to reiterate to the witnesses that their testimony is finished for today, and that we'll be inviting them back at a later date that works for everyone.
Mr. Pentland, Mr. Gilvesy and Ms. Botelho, it was very interesting, and we want to continue to ask you questions so that we can benefit from your expertise. Thank you very much.
Ms. Pauzé, you have the floor.
Bloc
Monique Pauzé Bloc Repentigny, QC
It's a dilatory motion, I've just been told.
I'm tabling this motion so that we can get on with the debate right away.
Liberal
Bloc
Monique Pauzé Bloc Repentigny, QC
I don't agree with your decision to rule it in order.
In fact, Mrs. Chatel's motion opens up a whole new debate. It's not that it's not interesting, on the contrary, but we have a motion before us. I think we could proceed quickly.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
Ms. Pauzé objects to the chair's decision to rule the amendment in order. This is a motion without debate. We shall now proceed to the vote.
NDP
Taylor Bachrach NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC
On a point of order, the interpretation said that the ruling of the chair was that the amendment was out of order. I heard you say that the amendment was in order.
NDP
Taylor Bachrach NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC
Well, the interpretation just said the ruling was that the amendment was out of order. Maybe we can just clarify.
Conservative
Dan Mazier Conservative Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa, MB
The challenge to the chair is that it is out of order.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
Mrs. Chatel, I'd like to ask you for clarification. I want to make sure I understand.
You're not asking for a study. You're asking for information on adjustments. You're not asking the department to provide an exhaustive analysis. It's more of an inquiry, correct?
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
I just want to clarify that, Mr. Deltell.
Is that it, Mrs. Chatel?
Liberal
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Chair, what is the exact wording of the motion?
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
I'm getting there.
We'll soon get back to Ms. Pauzé, who expresses her disagreement with my decision.
Mrs. Chatel, could you please read the wording of your amendment to Mr. Mazier's motion so that we can fully understand?
Liberal
Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC
It would simply be a matter of adding the fact that since representatives from Environment and Climate Change Canada will be with us to present the analyses, they could also give us an update on the status of border carbon adjustments during these presentations.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
Perhaps I misunderstood the original motion.
Mr. Mazier, you're not asking for the department to appear. It's about providing information.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
All right. We do not request that departmental representatives appear before the committee.
Liberal