I'll quickly go back to the international comparison with the United States.
I know they have the conservation reserve program, which is widely used down there. It is largely based on prevailing land rental rates. As we have an expansion in the size of equipment, there are more and more areas of marginal land that simply don't make sense for farmers to work with.
Would you be in support of a program like that, one that provides a meaningful commitment, financially, to farmers, so they can try to remove some of that marginal land, or towards wetland enhancement or creation? Is that a model we should be following?