Thank you.
I would just observe that I was only responding to the point of order from my colleague when I got point of ordered again saying that I ought to stay on topic, so I will try to stay on topic with respect to this motion in particular.
With that, I think I will table the amendment. It's that we simply drop the clause in there about....
Mr. Bachrach, if you'll indulge me, because I don't have it in front of me. Perhaps it's a friendly amendment if we can simply drop the section that says we report this to the House. It would be, “with the Government of British Columbia to establish a $1 billion watershed security fund; and that the government table a written response.”
Does everybody agree?