I don't know exactly where this is heading. I'm just wondering. I do question a little bit the relevance of the comments.
Mr. van Koeverden, maybe you could explain how this connects to Mr. Bachrach's motion. I saw a hint of that when we talked about watersheds and pollution from the sky that gets into a watershed. In fact, when we were studying the oil sands, the development in 2007—I keep going back to that—one of the vectors in the study was the notion that pollution from the industry was going into the air and getting into the water through the air, as opposed to seeping into the water from tailings ponds.
It is relevant in that respect, but for a good chunk of what you're saying I'm not sure how it connects. I'd like to give you the opportunity to maybe say how it connects to the motion.