Two and a half minutes isn't much, Mr. Corson.
Earlier, a member accused the Bloc Québécois of vilifying the industry. I think you would agree that talking about contaminated water and extremely rare cancers isn't vilifying anything. I'm sure we can agree on that. The member also said that the truth was complicated. I say, repeating a falsehood over and over again doesn't make it true.
Why do I say that? I'll tell you. The results of independent testing show the opposite of what you said in the answers you offered up.
This is my question. In your opening statement, you said you remained committed to enhancing mitigations if future data demonstrated they were required. Which data are you speaking of? If you decide you need to do more, which data will you base that decision on?