Thank you for the question, Mr. Bachrach.
This is not a criticism of the work of the environment commissioner, but it's important to remember that his work is based on data that is already a year old. When he did his report, we hadn't announced the zero-emission vehicle mandate. We hadn't announced the clean electricity regulations. We had not announced the new targets for methane. We hadn't announced the cap on oil and gas emissions. We hadn't phased out fossil fuel subsidies. These are all new elements that have happened since the commissioner was able to do the work.
The issue of modelling is extremely complex. One of the things we have started doing, following recommendations by the environment commissioner, is to work with other organizations on modelling to perfect—although it will never be perfected—or improve the modelling we do. We share this information so that other organizations—I can certainly think of at least one other, which is the Climate Institute—can contest whether the modelling we're doing and the assumptions in the projections that are in the documents, such as the progress report of the ERP, the emissions reduction plan, are valid.
I'll be the first one to acknowledge that it is a challenging sphere and one in which we're trying to improve year after year.