That process should unfold in much the same way as it would otherwise. The review of the estimates by the committee, with or without the panel, should unfold in the same manner.
I think what might be a little different is some of the conversation you might have with the agents at that point in time around the development of their estimates and the degree to which they feel their resource requirements have been met or not met.
They may bring to you a different kind of view on that issue. Of course, I wouldn't want to speak on their behalf, but in that there would be a different dynamic leading up to the creation of the estimates, you may find a different kind of conversation in your review of the estimates.