Thank you.
I have just one question to follow up on Mr. Stanton's. We recently had a case in southern Ontario, in St. Thomas specifically, where the father was alleged to be abusing his child online. The police were trying to prevent that crime from continuing, so they called the server to ask for the name and address of the person. I gather that there was some reluctance by the server to give up that information. Would the reluctance by the server have been under PIPEDA--by the way, Mr. Simpson, I prefer that pronunciation, so I'll go with you--or would the alleged concern of the provider have been under the Privacy Act? Which of those two would it have been?