Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I'm sorry I missed a chunk of your thing, but the timing has been all fouled up today with some speeches.
I'm new, as is Madame Lavallée, and the only experience I have with privacy at this point has been do we send them a Christmas card or not, and how did we get their name, and all of those kinds of things. And I'm not going there.
The question I have for you, to begin with, is that legislation has only been in place for about five years, to my understanding, because we're coming up to the review. The health part, which can be relatively controversial, and which may be the most important part, as has been mentioned, has only been around for about a year and a half. Are we premature in even reviewing it without having a good sense of whether or not the thing is working for us and where recommendations and changes might be needed? Should we be saying here's some information that we've had from witnesses such as you, but we really need two or three more years of education on the piece on how it's actually working before we can make any real solid decisions?
If you wouldn't mind answering that, I'd appreciate it.