Yes, in a Federal Court judgment.
The purpose of the act is to settle complaints. I think the purpose of an act isn't, in itself, to make orders. The purpose of the act and of the machinery that administers it is to ensure compliance. If you take a close look — which few people have done — at current compliance with this act regarding the complaints process, you'll see that it's very great, except for a few judgments such as in the Blood Tribe judgment, for example.
I don't think the problem is the way complaints are handled. I don't think it's less efficient than what you see before the courts. I administered a tribunal in Quebec, so I think I'm talking in full knowledge of the facts. Before the courts, there may be enormous legal complications. It's not as quick as we'd like. The problem isn't the handling of complaints received. The problem is everything that happens that isn't subject to a complaint. I think that's the major issue.