As I said, it's always easier to define things in a particular fact context. You mentioned that this issue came up again and again. It doesn't come up very often in our complaints. I don't know how many complaints we've had that would deal with that--perhaps a handful. This is not an issue that dominates our complaints.
One issue that does come up a lot in our complaints, and one area where we have active concern, is about the use RFIDs or other ways of surveilling people in workplace surveillance. Those of us who work for anybody are going to be subjected to increasing surveillance.
So yes, you could put a definition in the act. We're just cautioning you that any definition may have this indirect effect, with new forms of technological surveillance coming, of providing less protection for workers.