I have a question in terms of three or four hours. I haven't seen how that actually ends up. If you take time for supper and so on, does that kill a whole hour? Is it felt that we need four hours of proceedings to accomplish what is in front of us between now and the adjournment? What works better there? It doesn't really matter to me. I'd be probably favouring the three hours straight and then that gets it done with and that allows the members to get on with whatever events or other activities they need to get to. But if it's felt that we need that four hours or the extra half hour that might afford, then that would be worth knowing.
On May 15th, 2006. See this statement in context.