I just have a comment. I am astonished. In almost all areas of government, under just about every act, when someone breaches the law, that fact is automatically made public; the public is able to know who contravenes the law. However, it seems that when this legislation was drafted, somebody wanted to give these businesses a break by saying that the names of offenders would not be publicized. Personally, this looks to me as an enormous privilege. I cannot understand why such a privilege was given to those corporations at the outset, when the bill was drafted.
On December 4th, 2006. See this statement in context.