The information legislation specifically forbids a head of an institution from providing personal information, unless there's a very strong overriding public interest in some cases. CBC is not yet subject to ATI, although we get third party requests all the time. We have not yet found a conflict, because when we get a request—and I'm sure other companies are the same—if it contains personal information, then we don't release it. We claim an exemption and we will sever portions. For example, under our current regime, if someone's given an opinion, you might release the opinion but not give the name of the person who gave it , because we are under PIPEDA.
Can you think of an example where there is a conflict that you've seen? If you were addressing—