We would have difficulty with that concept because the Privacy Commissioner is quite rightly a privacy advocate, and there's a bias there. That's not a criticism, that's the way she's appointed and that's the way it should be, but giving order-making powers to the Privacy Commissioner is like making the police the judge, the jury, and the executioner all together.
If the Federal Court were impractical, you might look at an independent tribunal or some neutral tribunal, but at the moment I think the Privacy Commissioner is fairly satisfied that this process with the Federal Court--and the teeth behind Federal Court is sufficient, my colleague here has pointed out, at least in our current experience.