Thank you very much.
Just anecdotally, I'm guessing that the five-year period makes some sense, because there's undoubtedly going to be an election and possibly a different group of people looking at the legislation. It may very well have been that the committee who recommended five years had assumed the act would be implemented more quickly. I suppose it could have easily been stated that it would be five years from the date of full implementation of the act, but we have to live with the way the legislation is.
We'll go right to Mr. Van Kesteren.