Okay, great. Thank you.
My other question has to do with publishing the names of companies that I would call delinquent. On the one hand, it's clear that the debate is largely focused on the fact that consumers are lacking information on the protection of their personal information. People are always under the impression that they will be protected, or on the contrary, sometimes there are people who are a bit more paranoid and are sure that everyone is distributing their personal information.
On the other hand, when companies are delinquent, their name is not disclosed. Personally, I really have a hard time understanding this fact. I know of no other legislation under which the names of delinquents are not made public, apart from pedophilia cases. I don't understand that.
What's more, you just said the names of delinquent companies shouldn't be disclosed. And yet an organization like yours appears to be interested in defending consumers.
Maybe I missed something. Could you clarify that?