I know of just one example, and it goes back to Mr. Van Kesteren's question. I think one of the things that's important to recognize is that most of the data or information that gets collected is de-identified from a patient's perspective. So a lot of these databases that get created for research purposes or for public health purposes don't actually have the direct identification of the patient in them. I think that's becoming a really important principle with respect to the handling of health care information, that when it gets aggregated and into databases, one of the really important processes is that it is de-identified so you're unable to identify individual patients from the data.
So there is a very important level of protection of the patient at that level of data aggregation