Yes, the Tournier case, in which it said you had the ability to take those steps. With PIPEDA coming in with the stricter sets of rules, it hemmed that in. So we're suggesting there should be an amendment that goes back to that common law standard.
January 30th, 2007 / 10:10 a.m.
Vice-President, Policy, Canadian Bankers Association
Yes, the Tournier case, in which it said you had the ability to take those steps. With PIPEDA coming in with the stricter sets of rules, it hemmed that in. So we're suggesting there should be an amendment that goes back to that common law standard.
See context to find out what was said next.