Yes, there you go.
I would characterize it like this--and I don't want to get too hung up here. In our remarks to you and in our submission, we have suggested some criteria for renotification, but we're not suggesting a hard bright line, because you have to look at every case. Is it serious fraud, or is it a bit of fraud?
We're just saying you can't hard-wire that. You have to look at the facts. And that's where the dialogue with the commission is important.
The difference here with what Warren is talking about is if person X is the bad guy and we're doing an investigation on person X, and we need to dig into some data to find out about person X because he's breached an agreement or he's kiting cheques or he's involved in money laundering, we don't want to tell him. But if you've had your personal information violated or breached, by golly, we're going to tell you. That's the difference.