Okay.
I think there is a provision in PIPEDA that provides for the publication of a name. When it's in the public interest, that name would be disclosed.
I think that's an appropriate provision when it's found by the Privacy Commissioner—because I don't think she will act outside the limits of her discretion under that provision—that a company is flagrantly abusing the privacy provisions under PIPEDA and the public interest is threatened. Individual consumers are threatened by the breaches that continue by such a company.
I think the provisions in PIPEDA adequately cover the situation where she might make that name public. I don't think we're opposing that provision.