That concludes the first round of seven minutes.
We'll now proceed with five-minute rounds.
Not as a member of this committee but as an individual, I must say that I agree with Ms. Bercovici on what she said about solicitor-client privilege. I've seen the withering away of solicitor-client privilege with the former Information Commissioner and I see it with the Privacy Commissioner.
This question is either to Ms. MacKenzie, Mr. Bundus, or to you, Ms. Bercovici, on the issue about the statements of witnesses.
It is almost as if you are suggesting that insurance companies should be privileged. It could be a criminal investigation or a highway traffic investigation. For example, for the police, for a crown attorney, or even for civil matters, you are suggesting those statements should not be allowed to be brought to be subpoenaed. Is that what you are suggesting?
I'm looking at Ms. MacKenzie or Mr. Bundus.