I think one of the reasons that NAID Canada and NAID Europe have been such a most credible source, of information is that we don't always take a position that might be the best economic thing for our members. We actually use this as a consumer advocacy organization, by our mission and charter.
We're supported by the industry. We took a position on professional liability insurance requirements for our members that cost them a lot of money, and I got a lot of hate mail as a result, but that was the right thing to do. In this case, we feel that notification is the right thing to do. Our members support NAID having an entree to venues like this because of that credibility, and they continue to support the association, even if we might take a position in that way.
That said, I think that if we were to in fact go to members and ask them--and we have not taken that survey—they would definitely see the benefits to the consumer, as well as the benefit to the industry, to have notification provisions that not only extend to high-tech, sensational electronic breaches, but include in that notification people put at risk by the casual disposal of hard-copy documents.