Mr. Chairman, thank you.
Mr. Peterson has pretty well asked my question. I have to say I congratulate the police for the work they do on this issue, and your organization as well, Mr. Sullivan. I understand the frustrations that the police particularly have in making investigations because of the restrictions that are put against you, hindering your investigations. I understand that.
I'm going to zero in on a question that has been pretty well asked several times. It's the issue of there not being a warrant, the lack of requirement for a warrant. I'd like to raise the issue of where there have been false accusations, abuse of process, oversight, and maybe there are other examples. The question was asked whether you had a proposed amendment, and I understand it's a tricky thing. We need all the help we can get, quite frankly.
My question is to both Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Pecknold. If you're not going to have to have a warrant in restricted situations, should there be some threshold? Otherwise, and I'm not casting aspersions on anyone, there could be an abuse with this not requiring a warrant. I understand your frustrations, particularly the police, but it can be dangerous.
Mr. Pecknold.