Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you, officers, for giving us your presentation.
I went through this presentation and deliberations you made to us, and looked at the two perspectives you are coming from. I certainly agree with you on those. With regard to ISP providers, if you don't get that information, child abuse can be on there. On the other hand, you say if the general public had access to the information on the investigation you are undertaking, there might be circumstances where it might also benefit the public.
Can you draw a line where they have access to the information you are investigating? Air India, for example, is a perfect case scenario. PIPEDA wasn't even in effect at the time.
The grave perception in the community right now is that the RCMP and CSIS...you know, you did not have the collaboration, or there wasn't enough public access to those investigations, and we would have avoided that big incident at that time. And there might be some other cases where the public might have some access to the investigation you are undertaking.
What is your opinion on those circumstances?