I did. When Parliament enacted PIPEDA, they anticipated the possibility that we could wind up with a patchwork, and that's why the provision for “substantially similar” is in there. It's an attempt to guide provinces towards some sort of harmonization.
Although when you look at the B.C. and Alberta laws that were passed subsequent to PIPEDA, and on the face of it they appear different because they're different drafting styles and they didn't go with the code and all of that stuff, nevertheless all of the principles in the CSA code are embodied in those two statutes. So they are in effect the same. They have minor differences but essentially operate the same way. I don't think business has a lot of trouble complying with all three.