Yes.
I would refer you to the brief we submitted. I believe this is a very significant act. First of all, I'd like to point out what we seem to be forgetting—the current interpretation creates an exception, and implies that PIPEDA does not apply to the situations envisaged by IMS.
Thus, in the interpretations, we recognize the issue of work product where information—in Quebec—is considered personal professional information. We believe that it would not be a good idea to amend the act, given that the status quo is already the goal we seek. Amending the act, which took years of discussion to craft, would be very significant indeed.
If you were to amend the act, you should examine all the circumstances in which the amendments would be required. You should also examine all the possible implications of the amendments, particularly worker monitoring and intellectual product monitoring in other fields, and with people other than physicians or health workers.
I would repeat that, in my view, the status quo already establishes that such situations are not covered by PIPEDA.