The law, as it is and as it has been interpreted, already distinguishes work product on the basis that it isn't personal information. So we are concerned that there's no reason to carve out for any particular constituency any type of personal information at this time.
Secondly, we're concerned, as you will see in the appendix that we submitted to this committee, that any kind of carve-out has an indirect effect on surveillance issues.
We're also concerned that if the members think of legislating in terms of work product, they take into account the context in which this particular amendment is requested, the particular industry that this request is involved in, and the legislative initiatives in other provinces that call, for example, in one province, for the consent of those whose work product it is.
That I think is a résumé of why we think it's inappropriate to proceed at this time with that.