All of the arguments that you put forward could be invoked in the case of Bill C-2. One could say that there are deficiencies in the bill and that it would consequently be appropriate to take more time to study it. Yet that did not keep you from presenting it. Furthermore, once all of the amendments have been studied, the Bloc Québécois is very likely to support it. We look favourably upon the passing of such a bill. The same can be said for the one dealing with transparency tabled by the Information Commissioner.
You spoke about partisanship, and one could think that Bill C-2 contains provisions to that effect. For example, you want to prohibit companies from funding leadership races. You're asking us to rework the access to information bill. You have made us aware of your dissatisfaction in the form of questions. I find that clever, but the fact remains that we are not fooled.
If we resume work on the bill with a great deal of seriousness, what guarantee do we have that it will be taken into consideration and that later on, it will take the form of a bill? What type of timeframe do you foresee with respect to the carrying out of the work?