You did issue an advisory. Then why would you need to offer such comments as this? This is attributed to a source, which apparently is you, and I quote: “the magnitude of the proposed secrecy shift in the (Accountability Act) sends a powerful signal to the bureaucracy that the government values secrecy over openness.”
Sir, does that agree with your earlier rendition, that you were simply advising journalists that the report would be tabled? Or would you not agree that this constitutes a disclosure of contents of the report?