So simply put, we're really not doing anything different from what was just suggested, except we may not have the legalese in front of us. Your suggestion is to take these 15 points, spread them over a few agendas, call witnesses on them from both sides of the fence, flesh them out, and feed them back to you. So when the bill comes back to us, discussion on those decisions would have already happened at the committee. Is that not a fair assessment of what we want to do?
On June 19th, 2006. See this statement in context.