Thank you.
The point my colleague from the other side is trying to make is that she doesn't believe that the government of today is serious about reform to the act. Even though you're quite critical in your response to the minister's response--in your language anyway, whether it's sincere or not--you state that part of it went into Bill C-2, but the rest has come here. It's not as if we've abandoned it; you just don't like the method by which we have decided to review it or tackle the issue.
Is that a fair statement?