I remember. This has been studied to death. I thought, and I still believe, that if you are serious about our having true input and control as a committee, had you given us that bill at first reading, prior to it getting approved of, in principle, at second reading, then we would have a proper bill, a working document, with the latitude to make significant amendments to it, because it's at first reading. Why didn't you go that route?
On June 19th, 2006. See this statement in context.