I think those are good questions, but I don't want to set out those concerns again. I thought I brought them to your attention in the course of my general comments. I know I had to move through them pretty rapidly. It's difficult to consider each aspect of them very carefully, but the reason we brought in this discussion paper instead of a bill was the Information Commissioner's own statement that he really hadn't had the opportunity to review some of these issues. Issues of cost, for example, need to be borne in mind. And some of the recommendations that were being made are fundamental to the operation of government—fundamental.
I know that in my own experience as a government lawyer for many years, I had to provide ministers with absolutely frank opinions on certain courses of conduct. I know those ministers wouldn't want to hear some things if in fact they thought they might be disclosed. I'm concerned about solicitor-client privilege, or violating solicitor-client privilege.