There is no way that the office either agrees or disagrees with a proposition put forward by a complainant until we've investigated. Every complainant that comes to us says there is no possible reason there should be secrecy, and the government institution says there's every reason for secrecy. Our job is to try to get to what is an objective, neutral view of the matter.
So if before investigating you're going to work to try to get the commissioner to agree with you that the secrecy is terrible, that's a fool's errand. It's not going to happen.