Thank you, Mr. Dhaliwal.
It's pretty clear from a procedural point of view. You get a complaint, let's say hypothetically, about the items that are in the newspaper. You actually are able to see the uncensored document in its entirety. You discuss with the relevant person who made the decision to censor it why they made the decision to censor it and what they censored. You measure that against the standards in the act.
Then what happens, once you've come to a conclusion?