Mr. Chairman, if you refer to the Standing Orders, you will see that your primary role is to ensure that all the items on the agenda are dealt with. I'm very surprised by your comments. We have always done that. If you have no intention of dealing with all the items on the agenda, why bother having one at all?
There is an agenda, however, and I believe that we should deal with all items. It's just common sense. I don't see why unanimous consent is needed to address two notices of motion that were properly provided. You received them in time. To me, it just makes sense to discuss the two motions listed on our agenda.
If I understood you correctly earlier, you said there are other ways of ensuring that all items on the agenda are dealt with. You said that you wouldn't say what they were, but if I ask you directly, will you answer me?