It says “any and all ATI requests”. That would mean that future requests could put off our study of this issue. I think it's far too open-ended. I don't see any problem in going with Madame Lavallée's approach. If there are things that prevent us from looking fully at this when it comes up, we'll be made aware of them at the time. But I would not support a motion that could indefinitely sideline us from dealing with this issue.
On May 10th, 2007. See this statement in context.