Thank you, Mr. Chair.
That piece that happened is part of the reason the wording of the advice is important for us to look at, particularly if we're going to review this section in the future and also as it relates to the report that's in front of us and the advice that may or may not have been in that report, and that's why it was blacked out.
I think it's an important issue. I'm sure nobody around this table wants to injure Canada. I'm not talking about the Government of Canada, but Canada, and any information that's released inappropriately, particularly information that has to do with Afghanistan and the good people we have working on the ground, both the military and in humanitarian efforts over there....
The other case that was previously mentioned that also has an effect in the advice section is Imperial Consultants of Canada v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration). It is an interesting one to look at in terms of how it affects this area of the legislation and whether it applies.
Another one that I think is particularly important to advice, the section that may have caused the ATI person to black that section out, is Merck Frosst Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of National Health). That must have been under the Liberals...it was; it was 2001-02, under the Liberal regime--