Okay. Thank you for that.
I'll move on to the next item: the 2000-01, “Reform of Cabinet Confidences”. That's another report that was referenced. It's a report that I think everybody should review. It goes to the heart of the matter of why you even have ATI people in departments; it goes to the heart of that.
If every report, including this one, Afghanistan 2006: Good Governance, Democratic Development and Human Rights were public, you couldn't take it to cabinet. You could never take a document to cabinet. Based on the act right now, the advice you're giving to the cabinet minister, the Prime Minister...those documents would become public. Everything would be done verbally; there would be nothing in writing.
I could verbally say a motion, which I did last week--my colleague from the Liberal Party didn't think that I had said it, but I said it twice--but providing it in writing gave people an idea of what it actually means, to make changes, agree or disagree and make sure it was in order, which I did.
In this case I think the report on cabinet confidences is important. It's included in the act. This report, which I have not seen, which has parts blacked out...the ATI person could have used the theory that there was advice in here that was either provided by other governments or by senior people in the department from Foreign Affairs and that it should not have been released. We have a report that talks about those issues. I would recommend to my colleagues that they look at that before they vote on this motion. We'll see if they will do that.