I think Mr. Martin was making my point. Mr. Martin said any third party would agree it was obvious. I'm not supporting this motion, because in the first motion we were waiting for the independent Information Commissioner to provide his report on whether this is accurate or not.
He was making my point that it should be done by an independent third party, that this committee is not an independent third party, and that's why I'm not supporting this motion, because I think the first motion has more relevance.